Tension & A Day in the Life

/
4 Comments

Tension Tower
Jeffre
http://www.flickr.com/photos/formatc1/
CC BY-SA 2.0
In my unprofessional opinion, writing is about creating and managing conflict throughout a story. Good writers build tension in a way healthy and organic to the narrative, and they maintain that tension until just the right moment, then the tension is released. It requires an intuition, I think, plus a lot of practice, to manage the conflict in a story.

I think one of the best examples of this intuitive aspect of writing is what Paul McCartney and George Martin did with the orchestral crescendos after the "I'd love to turn you on" line in the Beatles' song "A Day in the Life." Those crescendos are held until just the right moment, building tension, anticipation, and then, finally, release. And, also the release of that final chord--E-major--played by five people across three pianos and one harmonium. I've never spoken with a Beatles fan who didn't marvel at the majesty and brilliance of this song.

The song would be completely different without the final chord. It could have just ended like a normal song. It could have ended with a typical fade out or with single pop, like at the end of "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite." They could have transitioned from the first verse to the second, from the second to the McCartney-penned bridge without the orchestral crescendos, but if those things are omitted the song loses it's tension. It's loses it's release. It loses the thing that invokes within the listener such a strong emotional reaction.

It seems like so much in life is tension. It's easier to avoid relationships because eventually there will be a conflict that hits us on a deep, emotional level--the type of conflict that is difficult to resolve. Even though that release, that resolution, would be deeply moving and powerfully freeing, it's not like in "A Day in the Life." 

The Beatles could have omitted the orchestral crescendos, but they also could have held onto them too long. They could have held that tension so long that their presence was hurtful to the song, to the magnificent, even unexplainable, feelings that they create within the listener. If they'd done that, it would ruin it--not just that song, but the whole album would be different.

Tension
Miroslav Petrasko
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theodevil/
CC BY-SA 2.0
Tension in our relationships isn't necassarily bad. At least, that's what psychologists say. It can be indicative of growth, new ideas, new opportunities. Sure, it can be indicative of something bad, but it can mean something positive is actually happening and that we're clinging to the status quo when we need to let go.  The resolution, then, is the acting of letting go of the things or ideas to which we are clinging.

Tension in an interpersonal relationship can be trickier, though. The resolution isn't just something one person decides to do internally in their thinking. The two (or more) people must work it out; there must be a conflict. Many of us have just become accustomed to ignoring conflict and simply hoping the tension fades away. Probably with minor disagreements, this is possible. But, some conflicts create baggage. Things happen and we can't let go. We live with that tension in our lives--the crescendo is held for so long that the song, maybe even the whole album, is ruined. Tension, when it is not addressed with in an appropriate amount of time, becomes baggage that blinds us in the present. Things that happened a long time ago distort our present and we often miss out on what's happening, what's being said, what's being shared.

I'm not sure what makes us avoid tension-resolving conflict. It could be that letting go of that hurt means we let go of the ability to see ourselves as in-the-right and another person as in-the-wrong. I mean, sometimes that's why we cling to the hurt. Yeah, conflict can be really uncomfortable, but maybe we avoid it because grasping the baggage--holding too long to that crescendo--is comforting because it reassures us of our rightness or our goodness. It reassures us that we're experienced and that they're inexperienced. That we're educated and they're uneducated. That we're intelligent and they're unintelligent. That we're right and they're wrong. Even if that baggage makes us sick, what we have to give up in order to be rid of it presents itself as an impressively strong deterrent to resolution because it's rooted in our self-image. Maybe, it's even rooted in our selfishness.

At the moment, I don't feel that I have any such conflicts in my life. Certainly not that I'm aware of. This is just something I was thinking about as I compared tension in writing with real-life tension in interpersonal relationships. In literature (or music), we want the tension resolved, but that doesn't necessarily seem to be the case in life, which is interesting.


You may also like

4 comments:

Eddie Merkel said...

I am not sure that we don't want the tension resolved in real life. I think we anticipate it, even require it in literature because that is a world that: a) we expect to make sense to us and b) we understand we don't have control over. When these things are not true, I don't think we are very happy with our experience with that piece of literature/music or whatever.

I believe that in our "real life" we do want the tension resolved. The problem is that what is true and expected in literature are not true and can't be expected in real life. While we may think we have control, we don't, and that causes tension in and of itself. Our real problem is we seldom come to the realization that we are not as much in control as we think we are.

ktdidnokc said...

I am often excluded from invitations to watch movies at my home, and never allowed to choose what movie it is we will be watching because I refuse to watch movies where the 'boy gets the girl' or the 'world is saved' or any other 'warm fuzzy' ended movie. I don't like watching sit-coms either for the same reason. In reality, all life's problems aren't solved in thirty minutes; it's almost insulting to portray them as doing so. So I guess I can say I agree with Eddie when he says we want our literature to make sense to us. While I sat here contemplating all that was said, it occurred to me that my music, and literature are most appreciated when they end abruptly, like our lives really do here on earth, leaving the audience sitting there thinking, "WHAT JUST HAPPENED? WHAT'S NEXT? IS THAT THE END?"

Brian said...

Thanks, guys, for the feedback. I'm in the process of brainstorming a family saga that I'd like to write you're comments are actually really helpful. I've read East of Eden, and it's great, but it's boring. Family sagas are boring, but they're also engaging. It's strange. So, i've been thinking a lot these last few weeks about tension in a family saga because, not being fantastical in nature, such a story is thought to mirror life.

Brian said...

Katy, I think you and I probably have the same taste in movies. Although, I must admit that I am a sucker for The Wedding Singer.

If you haven't seen it, please check out The Wire. It is some of the finest writing, performing, and storytelling that I have ever witnessed.