Smile and Wait...Unless You Love Freedom

/
7 Comments
This young lass to the left is Tsehai, a giraffe who is the focal point of the Amharic-language program Tsehai Loves Learning. We have a DVD--it has English subtitles--of which I try to watch a little each day with the Queen Bee. She really likes the songs, but overall, I'd say I'm more into the program than she is. I'm a little fascinated, I guess, to see the differences and similarities between the children's educational programming in the States and in Ethiopia. One thing I really like about Tsehai Loves Learning is that the lessons are really about how we treat other people, as opposed to colors, numbers or letters. For example, here are the titles of the episodes on the DVD we own (click here to watch short previews of each episode): Truthfulness, Patience, Caring, Kindness, Love. Perhaps it's stereotypical, but I wonder if the reason isn't because Africa tends to be more community oriented (i.e., more tribal) whereas the U.S. tends to be more individual?

In any event, I recently had a memorable interaction with a family member while the episode on Patience was playing on the television. Tsehai is hungry and her father uses this opportunity to teach her a lesson on patience. She sings a little song: "I am hungry. Smile and Wait. Smile and Wait." Eventually, when it's appropriate, she will be able to eat. Watching the show from my discourse-analysis-clashing-cultures perspective, I said something like: "I think that song is a really interesting way to talk about patience."

Family Member: "What do you mean?"

Me: "Well, I just don't know that hunger would be a teaching situation in the U.S. But, here is the little giraffe singing, 'Smile and wait'."

Family Member: "Yeah, there seems to be bit of a communist slant to it: just smile and wait and someone will get food for me."

Me: [hangs head in amazement]

That was an incredibly sad stretch of the imagination in order distort this episode on patience into communist propaganda!

This wasn't a big part of the program, but it was there. It wasn't a whole program about hunger, but hunger came up and it was a small part of the lesson. In the States, most of us just assume food is going to be there. If it's not, we have ways of getting it (legal or otherwise). I really don't think, as I attempt to insert myself into the Ethiopian matrix, that an unholy, lazy work ethic was the lesson, but rather sometimes there isn't food and during those times you have to be patient.

I knew that this communism trope had really reheated since the last presidential election and, particularly, the recent health care debates, but I really had no idea how pervasive this shortcut-to-thinking had become!


You may also like

7 comments:

Unknown said...

[Pardon the length of the following essay, I couldn't find a maximum length in my syllabus.]

I know exactly how that goes. A beloved family member and I have often discussed politics. The fact is that he is intelligent and insightful, but his initial comments sound like rehearsed right-wing propaganda. When I press him to explain, he reinterprets these things into fairly reasonable ideas. He called me aside last time I talked to him and said that he was actually hurt by the way we dismissed him as if he drank the kool-aid . . . the thing is, he sounds as if he drank the kool-aid.

I don't agree with either side: everyone is just trying to keep their jobs, not trying to do what is best for the country. What would be best? Cut the budget as much as reasonably possible then tax the fur and toupees off the rich, tax the gas money of the middle class, and tax the rich on the taxes you just levied on them, tax everyone making over five figures as much as it takes to pay for what we spend. Tax the rich until they are middle class. Tax until it hurts and then a little more.

If they want approval from the masses they should give up their entire fortunes to pay part of the national debt and let their children live like the rest of us, on talent, merit, luck, and loans . . . or in despair, if necessary.

A family that spends beyond its means must learn to moderate before it gets in too deep, why do we let our government do differently? I'm all for federal health care -we'll need it if we tax ourselves as much as we need to- but we need to pay for it.

No more stealing: if we collect taxes for Social Security, they MUST only be used for that. Our government stole those, they should beg, borrow, and steal to fill the account (which does not even exist!) with every penny that was collected under that guise, and then tax us to pay off the debt incurred by their crime.

I must say that I really want a working federal health care system. Our economy cannot be any more threatened by it than it is by our military budget, and it will save as many lives . . . if it works. Germany has public health care and they are doing as well as anyone economically. We have already agreed that such things are compatible with our political theory: social security pays for those who don't pay in when necessary, and almost everyone will be paying taxes for this.

I'm not saying that I expect it to work in the first generation, such plans seldom do, but it is the right thing to do, so we must try. I have been alienated by those on both sides who opposed this recent health care bill because they said it wouldn't work, but then refused to propose one that would help those of us too poor and too young to find help elsewhere. The things proposed, almost without exception, were obviously intended to allow them to claim to care, but were never designed to pass.

At this point, dissenters are desperate enough to cling to claims of socialism, even in the face of their own use of federal socialist medical support. This is a classic response to conflict: essentially they have entered a level of conflict where logic is only possible within the constraints of preexisting beliefs. When challenged, both sides tend to simplify the other side to the point of ridiculousness.

The violent riots are not as far off as I'd like. We are about to rupture, and I don't know how to stop it.

We are fools.

Unknown said...

Dude, I just watched the preview on patience. I love these videos!!

Brian said...

Ty, there are no limits for you. Everyone else I limit. (See Jake's comment, immediately after your own, for an indication of how the limit is enforced. Jake actually went over his limit, but I'm only giving him a warning this time.)

Perhaps this is no surprise, but I couldn't agree with you more! (I don't think I've disagreed with you since 1998.) I really don't comprehend the pulse of the States. I just don't feel like I'm participating in the flow of the culture right now; I can't really feel that the country is headed for riots, but I really am taken aback by just how divisive the rhetoric is.

In the last year I've become increasingly interested in the new monastic movement, sabbath economics, et al. I'm currently reading Irresistible Revolution which, for all its flaws, is a pretty decent book. I hope to put a review online when I finish reading it and touch on some of these things.

When I read Irresistible Revolution, I begin to catch the vision of a realistic alternative. It doesn't quell my anger any little bit, but it is nice to feel a little hope dashed about the anger.

Brian said...

Jake, the videos really are good. I've enjoyed watching them and I look forward to when the Queen Bee is older so that we can talk about their content together.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Maybe we won't riot, it isn't something I feel in my intuitive sense of the state of the country so much as something I see in the histories of groups who became polarized to the point of rigid partisanship.

Our Civil War is not that far in the past, and our sides hate each other (or use the language of hate to simulate the real in the case of media personalities and politicians) more than they hated the North Vietnamese.

Our politicians remind me of Gross Pointe Blank: "It's not me. Why do people always think it's me?" but their profession is constructed as character assassination: a much more honest profession.

Unknown said...

read that last sentence as sarcasm